Glossary Updates6 new terms added to the glossaries · October 11, 2026, 13:38 CEST
AI TechDocKnowledge

The art of thinking · 6 · Judgment, action and error

Slips, lapses and mistakes

Also known as: Error types (James Reason), Action slips, Generic error-modelling system (GEMS)

In human error research, James Reason distinguishes slips (an intended action carried out wrongly), lapses (a step forgotten or a memory failure) and mistakes (an action carried out as planned, but the plan itself is wrong, either rule-based or knowledge-based); violations, deliberate deviations from rules, are treated as a separate category.

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human factors
  • Safety

In one sentence

Reason’s error types: slips (wrong execution), lapses (memory failures), rule- and knowledge-based mistakes (wrong plans); violations apart (1990).

Example

Pressing “Start” instead of “Reset” on the next button is a slip; forgetting to close the bleed valve is a lapse; following the restart procedure for the wrong fault is a rule-based mistake.

What the research shows

Donald A. Norman (1981) classified action slips — errors in carrying out an intention — by their origin, for example capture errors, in which a frequent action sequence takes over from the intended one. James Reason (1990) combined this work with Jens Rasmussen's skill-, rule- and knowledge-based levels in his generic error-modelling system (GEMS): slips and lapses occur at the skill-based level, when attention or memory fails during routine actions; rule-based mistakes apply a wrong rule or a good rule in the wrong situation; knowledge-based mistakes arise from incomplete knowledge or a wrong mental model in new situations. Reason treated violations — deliberate deviations from procedures — as a separate category with different causes, and later described accidents as resulting from latent conditions in organizations as well as from active failures.

Evidence status

The classification is widely used in safety science, human reliability analysis and incident investigation, and by regulators as a way to describe types of human failure. It is a descriptive taxonomy derived from error diaries, incident reports and theory; assigning a real error to one type requires knowing the person's intention, which is often uncertain. Later work, for example in resilience engineering, criticizes the focus on individual errors and stresses that error categories are judgments made after the event.

How it applies

Different error types call for different information: slips and lapses are reduced by cues, checks and confirmation at the point of action, mistakes by better rules, diagnosis aids and concept information. The glossary “Applied cognitive psychology for information use” covers the design side, for example checklists and resumption lag. Human error is the broader safety term in the machine safety glossary; documentation alone does not control human error — it is addressed in the risk assessment through design and protective measures first.

External references

How to read this pool

Entries, context cards and transitional topics

The art of thinking explains ways of thinking — where a method comes from, what it asks of you and how it was adapted later. You meet four kinds of content here, each with its own job:

Glossary entry
Defines one concept or method of thinking: its origin, an example and how it relates to neighboring ideas. “X vs. Y” sections set two methods side by side.
Context card of the art of thinking
A short, self-contained answer to one question about a way of thinking — its lineage, its steps, its limits. These cards are listed on The art of thinking only.
Transitional topicBridges both pools
A context card that bridges both pools: it shows how a way of thinking was adapted into documentation, analysis or quality practice. It sits with the reference context cards and is marked as transitional wherever it appears.
Reference entry or context card
Belongs to the Glossary & Norms Space on regulation, norms and engineering. Entries here link to one only where a method is also an established tool of documentation or quality work, such as the five whys or a user’s mental model.
All context cards of the art of thinking

By knowledge.aitechdoc.world · Published October 11, 2026 · Last reviewed

Source: James Reason, Human Error, Cambridge University Press, 1990

Definitions follow the cited philosophical and historical sources — primary texts, their standard translations and reference works such as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy — and, for cognitive psychology, the published research and its reviews, with the state of the evidence named in each entry. They are paraphrased, not quoted, unless a passage is marked as a quotation, and sayings that cannot be traced to a source stay attributed. Examples, comparisons and the notes on how a method was adapted are editorial commentary by knowledge.aitechdoc.world. None of these entries is a norm, a standard or a legal requirement, and applying one never replaces a method that a standard or a law requires.

Seen a mistake? Send us a note!